Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Fagin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 14, 1992No. SCBD 3755. OBAD 1021PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice:
Respondent, Arnold D. Fagin, was the subject of a formal complaint filed by the Oklahoma Bar Association, which alleged that he violated Rule 1.5 of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct, 5 O.S.Supp. 1988, Ch. 1, App. 3-A. The parties agree as to the material facts leading up to the filing of the complaint, and the only issue to be resolved is the construction of and application of Rule 1.5 to those facts. We find that respondent’s conduct violated the rule, and we impose a public reprimand for such misconduct.
Respondent entered into an agreement with Vickie Meyers to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Lien v. LienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Oliver's Sports Center, Inc. v. National Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Swanson v. SwansonOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
- Connors v. ConnorsTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alexander v. InmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. New Life Pentecostal Church of JenksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WeeksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- V. W. v. J. B.New York Supreme Court · 1995
- Marriage of Smith v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.