Legal Opinion

Naylor v. Dragoon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 1, 1951No. 358PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for personal injury by reason of an automobile collision. Trial was by jury. At the close of the evidence the defendant moved for a directed verdict on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The motion was denied. Verdict and judgment was for the plaintiff. The only question before us is raised by the exception of the defendant to the denial of her motion.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, as it must be on this motion, the evidence showed the following facts: The accident happened…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tyrrell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  2. Village of Wonewoc v. TaubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Hill v. StringerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  4. Huestis v. Estate of LaphamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  5. Appleyard Motor Transp. Co. v. Ray Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Lyman-Richey Sand & Gravel Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Smith v. GroveSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
  3. Bessette v. HumistonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  4. Stevens v. ShawNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Fleet Transportation, Inc. v. VoseMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API