Legal Opinion
Smith v. Grove
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 3, 1956No. 1273PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
This is an action of tort to recover damages because of personal injuries and property damage sustained by the plaintiff as the result of an automobile accident. Trial was by jury with a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The case is here on exceptions of the defendant to the denial of his motions for a directed verdict, to set aside the verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
The evidence showed that the automobile in which she was a passenger was owned by her and at the time and place in question it was operated by her son, Reginald, with her permission, knowledge, consent…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tyrrell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Duchaine, B.N.F. v. RaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- E. A. Strout Realty Agency, Inc. v. WoosterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
- Landry v. HubertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- MacAuley v. HydeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Follo v. FlorindoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Smith v. Blow and Cote, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Beaucage v. RussellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
- Lambert v. Equinox House, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.