Legal Opinion

Tyrrell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 4, 1937PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, C. J.

This action is brought to recover on two life insurance policies issued by the defendant on the life of Lester M. Tyrrell, and payable to the plaintiff, then his wife. One of these, hereinafter referred to as the small policy, was dated December 28, 1925. The other, hereinafter referred to as the large policy, was dated June 23, 1924. Premium payments were defaulted on both policies. The small policy went into extended insurance on December 23, 1929, at a commuted value of $1,048, for a period expiring December 31, 1938. The large policy went into extended insurance at a commuted value of…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. McFarland v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Holmes v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Epstein v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Gulle v. BoggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  3. New England Power Company v. Town of BarnetSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  4. Consolidated Motor Lines, Inc. v. M & M Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  5. Hinds v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API