Legal Opinion

Huestis v. Estate of Lapham

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 4, 1943PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherbuRne, J.

This is an appeal to the county court from the disallowance by the commissioners upon the defendant estate of a claim arising out of an automobile accident, in which the plaintiff's intestate, Mrs. Huestis, a guest passenger, was drowned. The declaration charges that the accident resulted from the gross and wilful negligence of Mr. Lapham in the operation of his automobile. Verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff and the defendant has excepted. The only exceptions briefed relate to the denial of defendant’s motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shaw, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. Tinney v. CrosbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Gero v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  4. Watterlund v. BillingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  5. Bombard v. NewtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bridges v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Martin v. SloanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. State v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  4. Rivard v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
  5. Benoit v. MarvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API