Legal Opinion

Village of Wonewoc v. Taubert

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1930PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

No question is raised as to the verdict being fully supported by the evidence if the ordinance under which she was prosecuted was a valid ordinance.

The defendant contends here, as she did before the circuit court, that said ordinance is void (1) because the village of Wonewoc had no authority to enact it; (2) because the ordinance is indefinite and uncertain because it does not define “parking;” (3) because the ordinance is discriminatory; and (4) because it is unreasonable.

The plaintiff, on the other hand, contends that the village board had authority to enact this ordinance and that it is a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. City of Superior v. RoemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. First Wisconsin National Bank v. Town of CatawbaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Pugh v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Ellinwood v. City of ReedsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Northern Indiana Transit, Inc. v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Leveillee v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Rue v. WendlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Palmer v. MarceilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API