Legal Opinion
Haas v. Meisner
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 2002No. A097704PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAMBDEN, J.
Richard S. Haas (Haas) appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ of mandate. Haas petitioned for an order requiring the City of Berkeley (Berkeley) and Acting Chief of Police Roy Meisner (Meisner) (collectively respondents) to renew an endorsement permitting Haas to carry a concealed weapon. He contends that under Penal Code section 12027, subdivision (a)(1)(A), 1 he is entitled to the endorsement. We conclude that he does not satisfy the requirement of being an “honorably retired” peace officer under section 12027, subdivision (a)(1)(A), because he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Renee J. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Ford v. GouinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Lafayette v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
3Cited by8 opinions
- Albillo v. Intermodal Container Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Azusa Land Partners v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- City of Long Beach v. California Citizens for Neighborhood EmpowermentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Akopyan v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Gore v. ReisigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.