Ford v. Gouin
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARABIAN, J.
As in the companion case of Knight v. Jewett, ante, page 296 [11 Cal.Rptr.2d 2, 834 P.2d 696] (hereafter Knight), the issue in this case is whether plaintiff’s cause of action, arising out of an injury allegedly caused by the negligence of a coparticipant in an active sport, is barred under the assumption of risk doctrine. As explained in Knight, in light of the adoption of comparative fault principles in Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804 [119 Cal.Rptr. 858, 532 P.2d 1226, 78 A.L.R.3d 393], the assumption of risk doctrine operates as a complete bar to a plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Inc. v. Planning CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.