Legal Opinion

West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 16, 1991No. 890379-CAPublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

Appellant West Valley City appeals from a judgment awarding compensation for condemned property to appellee Majestic Investment Corporation. We affirm.

FACTS

Majestic Investment Corporation held interests in two parcels of property located in West Valley City which Majestic leased from Henry S. Pickrell and Barbara M. Pickrell. Majestic built two commercial buildings on the property and leased them in turn to Prudential Federal Savings and Loan and The Lockhart Company. West Valley City brought this action to condemn Majestic’s interests by right of eminent domain. West…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Acton v. DeliranUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. LovegrenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Spears v. WarrUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Smith v. Fairfax Realty, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. T.M. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API