Maverik Country Stores, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION 1
BILLINGS, Presiding Judge:
Maverik Country Stores brings separate appeals from two decisions of the Industrial Commission of Utah. The first appeal is from the Industrial Commission’s determination that Maverik violated Utah Code Ann. §§ 34-35-1 to -8 (1988 & Supp.1993), the Utah Anti-Discrimination Act, in its treatment of Vicky Ann McCord. The second appeal is from the Industrial Commission’s ruling that Maverik’s request for agency review was untimely. We dismiss the first appeal and affirm the ruling in the second. We remand for assessment of attorney fees.
FACTS
Ms. Jones,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Parisi v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. LamoreauxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- King v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Carter v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Cache County v. Property Tax Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Beaver County v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Frito-Lay v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Ramsay v. Kane County Human Resource Special Service DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.