Baird v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment that he take nothing by his action, and for costs in favor of defendant. The action is upon a complaint which states a cause of action for damages alleged to have resulted from a wrongful and forcible ejectment of plaintiff by defendant from its electric railway car. The answer denies the liability of defendant for damages, pleads contributory negligence of plaintiff, and sets- up as an affirmative defense a settlement with plaintiff for all alleged damages, as shown by three separate agreements and releases, signed by the plaintiff and' set out in full…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Mullen v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Meyer v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Brooks v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
3Cited by15 opinions
- Garcia v. California Truck Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Gajanich v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Sproul v. CuddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.