Legal Opinion

Baird v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1919No. Civ. No. 2868PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment that he take nothing by his action, and for costs in favor of defendant. The action is upon a complaint which states a cause of action for damages alleged to have resulted from a wrongful and forcible ejectment of plaintiff by defendant from its electric railway car. The answer denies the liability of defendant for damages, pleads contributory negligence of plaintiff, and sets- up as an affirmative defense a settlement with plaintiff for all alleged damages, as shown by three separate agreements and releases, signed by the plaintiff and' set out in full…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Mullen v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  3. Meyer v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Brooks v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Garcia v. California Truck Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Gajanich v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Sproul v. CuddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API