Legal Opinion

Carr v. Seigler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1915No. 5768PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Cotmty Court, Comanche County; H. N. Whalin, Judge. Action by John Seigler, against Ira E. Carr. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BRETT, C.

This action was brought in the county court of Comanche county by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, as de-. fendant, to recover damages alleged to be due by reason of the cattle of plaintiff in error trespassing upon the defendant in error.

The plaintiff in error assigns a number of errors, but does not cite or quote a single authority in support of any of them. The first and most important assignment, however, goes to the sufficiency of the petition. The petition is defective, but no demurrer was filed against it, and its sufficiency was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Marshall v. HomierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. First National Bank v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  4. Bountiful City v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Reeser Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Erwin v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Reed v. United States Hoffman MacH. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Wyant v. LevySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Raymer v. First Nat. Bank of BerwynSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API