Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Cochran

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1906PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from the District Court of Grant County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tbe court by"

PaNCOast, J.:

This was an action, in replevin, for the recovery of certain personal property, originally brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error before a justice of the peace of Grant county. Cochran filed his petition on the 28th of January, 1904, alleging therein special ownership in the property by virtue of a certain chattel mortgage, and at the same time filed his affidavit in replevin, which contained the averment that he was the owner of the property mentioned. Judgment was rendered against the bank by default, and the qause appealed to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Laithe v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Bradley v. ParkhurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  3. Moody v. ArthurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Robbins v. Barton Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. Mills v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Sulsberger & Sons Co. v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. First Bank of Texola v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. McClellanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Carr v. SeiglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API