Marshall v. Homier
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from- the District Gourt of Kingfisher County; before G. F. Irwin, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OR FACTS. An action by plaintiff in error. against defendant in error in the district court of Kingfisher county to reform a deed. Trial and judgment for defendant in error. Motion for new trial overruled, and exception by plaintiff in error, who brings the case here upon petition for review.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Beauohamp, J.:
The plaintiffs in error filed their petition in the district court of Kingfisher county on the 11th day of June, 1900, praying the reformation of a deed, and fox an injunction. The facts alleged in the petition so far as are necessary for consideration in this case, are:
“That on the 22nd day of March, 1900, the said plaintiffs were the owners in fee simple of, and in possession of, and entitled to the possession of, the following described real estate, situated in the county of Kingfisher and Territory of Oklahoma, to-wit; the northeast quarter of section…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Snell v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Elliott v. SackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Bradford v. President of the Union Bank of TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Chapman v. VeachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kelly v. MosbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Northwest Thresher Co. v. McNinchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- First Bank of Texola v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Oklahoma City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. McClellanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.