Bountiful City v. Lee
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from tbe Second District Court, Davis County.— Hón. H. H. Bolapp, Judge. Action to recover a certain sum of money under tbe facts as stated in tbe opinion. From a judgment in favor of tbe defendants, tbe plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBaskin, C. J.
Tbe complaint in tbis case was filed on tbe twenty-fourtb of December, 1902, and it is alleged therein: That Bountiful City was incorporated *184and organized on the first day of January, A. D. 1893. That the South Branch of West Bountiful Mill Creek Water Ditch is an artificial irrigation ditch owned, operated, and maintained by these defendants, through and along which defendants convey water as hereinafter set forth; and the said ditch intersects and crosses said Fourth West street within the corporate limits of said city. That section 14 of an ordinance of Bountiful City, entitled “An…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Carr v. SeiglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915