Legal Opinion

City of Wauwatosa v. Milwaukee County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1963PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The complaint was grounded upon sec. 59.07 (52) (a), Stats., 1 which authorizes the defendant to reimburse municipalities in which county buildings are situated for the expense of the transmission and disposal of sewage from such buildings. Our decision turns upon the meaning of the word “may” as used in the section. If the word “may” means “may” and is discretionary, the trial court was correct in dismissing the complaint, but if “may” means must or shall and is thus mandatory, a reversal is required.

The facts are not in dispute. For many years in what was the town of Wauwatosa the defendant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cothren v. LeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Scanlon v. City of MenashaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. BarnellOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Shulse v. City of MayvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Dean v. BorchseniusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Schmidt v. Department of Local Affairs & DevelopmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Layton School of Art & Design v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. American Motors Corp. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API