Legal Opinion
Shulse v. City of Mayville
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1937PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
After alleging that the plaintiff is a golf course greens keeper by occupation and the corporate character of the defendant, the complaint continues :
“That on or about the 15th day of April, 1934, the defendant city, by its mayor, Walter Schellpfeffer, entered into an agreement with the plaintiff whereby it was agreed that the *627plaintiff would perform services as foreman and overseer and supervise the work on Mayville City Works Project No. 14B123 and it was further agreed that the said city would pay the plaintiff the reasonable value of his said services as supervisor.
“That in accordance…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Frederick v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Thomson v. Town of EltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Eau Claire Dells Improvement Co. v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- McGillivray v. Joint School District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Watts v. WattsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Lindquist Ford, Inc. v. Middleton Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- City of Wauwatosa v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Fail-Safe, L.L.C. v. A.O. Smith Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Hurdis Realty, Inc. v. Town of North ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.