Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cothren v. Lean

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1859PublishedCited by 70 opinions

WRIT OF MANDAMUS. The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in the opinions of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Paine, J.

This was an application for a writ of mandamus, to compel Joseph Lean, the register of deeds of Iowa county, to keep his office at Mineral Point. An alternative writ was issued at the last term, and on the return day counsel appeared on behalf of Lean, and moved *281to quash the writ, for alleged defects in the petition on which it was granted. This motion was argued in the absence- of the relator, but was not disposed of, and owing to the changes of the judges composing this court, a re-argument wa ordered.

At the present term the relator has filed a motion to strike from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  2. People v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  3. State ex rel. Knowlton v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  4. West v. BlakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Clark v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Cheney v. CoughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Milwaukee County v. IsenringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. City of Wauwatosa v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API