Buchanan v. Collier
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
John Buchanan, one of the two defendants, appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Ron Collier, against Buchanan and his co-defendant Jack Newsome. Newsome does not appeal. The verdict was for $100,000 but the trial court remitted it to $50,000. Collier, in response, attacks the remittitur. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
The issues presented on appeal are whether the plaintiff suffered damages; whether the evidence was sufficient to prove the existence of an agency relationship between Buchanan and Newsome; whether the trial court erred when…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Lawler Mobile Homes, Inc. v. TarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Aspinwall v. GowensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Mobile Dodge, Inc. v. AlfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Yancey v. FarmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Acceptance Ins. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Reserve Nat. Ins. Co. v. CrowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc. v. Cobasys, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2009
- Buchanan v. CollierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Matkin v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.