Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Collier

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1989No. 88-547PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Buchanan, one of the two defendants, appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Ron Collier, against Buchanan and his co-defendant Jack Newsome. Newsome does not appeal. The verdict was for $100,000 but the trial court remitted it to $50,000. Collier, in response, attacks the remittitur. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The issues presented on appeal are whether the plaintiff suffered damages; whether the evidence was sufficient to prove the existence of an agency relationship between Buchanan and Newsome; whether the trial court erred when…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Lawler Mobile Homes, Inc. v. TarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Aspinwall v. GowensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Mobile Dodge, Inc. v. AlfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Yancey v. FarmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Acceptance Ins. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Reserve Nat. Ins. Co. v. CrowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc. v. Cobasys, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2009
  4. Buchanan v. CollierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Matkin v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API