Legal Opinion

Hammond v. City of Gadsden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 11, 1986No. 84-1046, 84-1133PublishedCited by 411 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves an appeal and cross-appeal from the trial court's order granting the City of Gadsden a new trial, conditioned upon the plaintiff's refusal to accept a remittitur of damages.

Prior to 1980, employees of the City of Gadsden were insured for hospitalization, major medical, short-term disability, and life insurance coverage through General American Life Insurance Company. The plan provided conversion privileges for employees to continue participation in the program after retirement. The plan also provided conversion privileges for the retiree's spouse upon the death of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Aspinwall v. GowensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Alabama Power Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. B & M HOMES, INC. v. HoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. General Motors Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Berkel & Co. Contractors v. Providence Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by411 opinions

  1. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

406 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API