Legal Opinion

Yancey v. Farmer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 7, 1985No. 83-708PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James Farmer filed this action for compensatory and punitive damages against Granvil Yancey and his wife, Willodean Yancey, for assault and battery, false imprisonment, and conspiracy to commit assault and battery and false imprisonment. The jury returned a verdict against each defendant for $85,000.00. A judgment for $170,000.00 was entered against the defendants and they appeal.

Farmer and the Yanceys lived about a half-mile apart in a rural community. They had known one another most of their lives and apparently there had been no ill will between them prior to the incident in question.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Williams v. WoodmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Brown v. ParnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Phillips v. MorrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Battle v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Acceptance Ins. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Dinmark v. FarrierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Buchanan v. CollierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Durham v. FarabeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Gray v. Gray (In Re Gray)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API