Reserve Nat. Ins. Co. v. Crowell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
These appeals are from a judgment based on a jury verdict awarding compensatory and punitive damages to Ray and Myrtle Crowell in an insurance fraud action against Reserve National Insurance Company and Phillip Bailey. Reserve National and Bailey appeal the trial court's denial of their motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. Reserve National appeals, in the alternative, from the trial court's order of remittitur. The Crowells cross-appeal from the order of remittitur. We affirm.
Bailey, a field agent for Reserve National, sold Medicare supplement policies to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Central Alabama Elec. Co-Op. v. TapleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Old Southern Life Insurance Company v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Reserve National Insurance Co. v. Crowell Et UxSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- AALAR, Ltd., Inc. v. FrancisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Ex Parte Dunlop Tire Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.