Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1914No. 12095PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court May 28, 1914, for a writ of mandamus to compel the superior court for Grant county, Steiner, J., to proceed with the trial of a cause.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

— This is an original mandamus proceeding in this court wherein the relator seeks to compel the superior court for Grant county to proceed with the trial of the assessment of damages and compensation in the condemnation proceeding of Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie, this relator, against the Northern Pacific Railway Company et al., and the annullment of an order of that court staying proceedings therein until another action pending in that court is tried and determined, wherein certain of the defendants, additional claimants in the condemnation proceeding, are seeking to quiet their title to the waters…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Grant Realty Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Murphy v. SnookWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State ex rel. McDonald v. SteinerWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. In Re Crab Creek and Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Grant Realty Co. v. Ham, Yearsley & RyrieWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API