Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Grant Realty Co. v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1913No. 11636PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court October 21, 1913, for a writ of prohibition or a writ of certiorari to review an order of the superior court for Grant county, Steiner, J., entered October 21, 1913, denying leave to file a complaint in intervention and refusing to abate tbe trial of condemnation proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an original application for a writ of prohibition, and in the alternative for a writ of review.

On October 7,1910, Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie, a corporation, instituted eminent domain proceedings against the Northern Pacific Railway Company, a corporation, Arthur L. Pettigrew, F. S. Pettigrew, R.. F. Pettigrew, and Bessie Pettigrew, his wife, “and all unknown owners and all persons unknown having or claiming an interest or estate in the lands affected by the action,” to condemn certain lands at the outlet to Moses lake, in Grant county, averring in its petition that the land was to be used…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Griffith v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Hill v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State ex rel. Foster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. In Re Crab Creek and Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Grant Realty Co. v. Ham, Yearsley & RyrieWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State ex rel. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API