Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Murphy v. Snook

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1914No. 11643PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered June 7, 1913, dismissing disbarment proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This proceeding was instituted in the superior court by the prosecuting attorney for King county, as relator, at the instance of the Seattle bar association, seeking the disbarment of the defendant from practicing law in the courts of this state. The defendant stands charged with misconduct as an attorney in procuring certain property of his client, A. H. Tantow, and refusing to account *672therefor. The cause came on for trial in the superior .court on J une 27, 1912, when, before any evidence upon the merits was presented, it appearing to the court that Tantow had not commenced any action in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. In the Matter of ____, an AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Wernimont v. State ex rel. Little Rock Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Matter of DanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Fowler v. FinleySupreme Court of Florida · 1892

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Board of Medical Examiners v. MacyWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. In Re BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State Board of Medical Examiners v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State Ex Rel. Greene County Bar v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. State ex rel. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API