Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Department of Water & Power
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1990No. B027345PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GOERTZEN, J.
After the 1981 Chatsworth fire, several property owners and insurance companies filed suits against the Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles (DWP) and the City of Los Angeles. Pursuant to written stipulation, the actions were consolidated. Included in the various causes of action was one for inverse condemnation. With the exception of the inverse condemnation cause of action, the matter was tried to a jury, which found for DWP and against the plaintiffs. Simultaneously, the inverse condemnation cause of action was tried to the court, which found for the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Sanchez v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- City of Ripon v. SweetinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Pacific Bell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.