Legal Opinion

City of Ripon v. Sweetin

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 2002No. C036592, C037212PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

This dispute in these consolidated appeals involves (1) valuation of property taken in eminent domain for a highway interchange project, and (2) litigation costs. Plaintiff City of Ripon (City) valued the property at $190,000, with light industrial use being the “highest and best use” of the property. The property owners, defendants Marshall C. Sweetin and Billie A. Sweetin, asserted the value was $356,000, based on “highway commercial” use being the “highest and best” use to which the property was reasonably adaptable. Over the City’s objection, the trial court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Starrh and Starrh Cotton Growers v. Aera Energy LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Red Mountain, LLC v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Magic Kitchen LLC v. Good Things International, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API