Legal Opinion

United States v. King

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided May 20, 1982No. NMCM 81 2051PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

At a general court-martial with members, appellant was found guilty, consistent with his pleas, of eleven specifications of larceny and one specification of wrongful appropriation under Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 10 U.S.C. § 921; one period of unauthorized absence in violation of Article 86, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 886; eleven specifications of forgery under Article 123, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 923; nine specifications of making worthless checks under Article 123(a), UCMJ; and three specifications alleging the making or presenting of a false writing in violation of Article 132,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. United States v. RivasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. AndreozziArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  2. United States v. GagnonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API