Legal Opinion

United States v. Collins

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided December 18, 1980No. ACM S25089Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

Contrary to paragraph 75c (2), Manual for Courts-Martial 1969 (Rev.), the military judge questioned the accused during his unsworn statement. However innocent the intent, this violation of the accused’s right to testimonial silence was error. United States v. Wells, 13 U.S.C.M.A. 627, 33 C.M.R. 159 (1963); United States v. Strivers, 12 U.S.C.M.A. 315, 30 C.M.R. 315 (1961); United States v. King, 12 U.S.C.M.A. 71, 30 C.M.R. 71 (1960); United States v. Suttles, 6 M.J. 921 (AFCMR 1979); United States v. Whitt, 9 M.J. 953 (NCMR 1980); United States v. Hayworth, 43 C.M.R. 509 (ACMR 1970).*

T…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. WeatherfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. SpiveyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  5. United States v. StiversUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API