State Highway Commission v. Saylor
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Couet by
Deuey, Commissionee—
Reversing.
Joe Saylor’s claim for compensation was not allowed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. He filed petition for review in the circuit court, which reversed that finding and remanded the case to' the board with instructions to make him an award, from which judgment the state highway commission has appealed.
The Workmen’s Compensation Board in its findings-made a statement from which this is copied:
“On September 10, 1931, the plaintiff, Joe Say-lor, was employed as a road-hand on the Mayo Trail Highway and was engaged in the work of mowing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Phil Hollenbach Co. v. HollenbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Donovan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- De Constantin v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Swanson v. LathamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Terlecki v. StraussSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Elliott v. BehnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Blaustein v. Mitre Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- Ratliff v. EplingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- Ward v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.