Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Behner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1939No. 34,468PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was a garnishment proceeding wherein the plaintiff in an action for damages sought to collect the judgment she had obtained in her damage action from a corporation she claimed was indebted to the defendant in that action. Judgment was for the plaintiff. The garnishee appeals.

At the outset the garnishee demanded a jury trial. This was denied. The facts were found by the trial court in substance as follows: At the time the cause of action for damages arose the Employers Casualty Company had issued to Montgomery county a policy covering a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cox v. Kansas City Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Bevard v. Skidmore-Patterson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Robertson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Haas v. Kansas City Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. American Fidelity & Casualty Company, Inc. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Jameson v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. B. & H. Passmore Metal & Roofing Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  5. Allor v. DubayMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API