Legal Opinion

Donovan's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 27, 1914PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.

The contest here is between Donovan, an employee of one McGreevey, and an insurance company which had insured McGreevey under the provisions of St. 1911, c. 751, Part V, 3, as amended by St. 1912, c. 571, § 17. The point in dispute is whether Donovan’s injury arose out of and in the course of his employment, within the meaning of Part II, § 1, of the act of 1911 above cited. See McNicol’s Case, 215 Mass. 497. This must be decided upon the facts found by the Industrial Accident Board in its review of the report of the committee of arbitration. St. 1911, c. 751, Part III, §§ 5, 10, 16, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Feneff v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Boyle v. Columbian Fire Proofing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  4. Coakley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Kilduff v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Heaps v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  4. Claim of Littler v. George A. Fuller Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Harrison v. Central Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1919

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API