Legal Opinion

In Re Occupational License of Hutchinson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1989No. C0-88-2493PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

Kathy Hutchinson initially appealed a decision of the Minnesota Racing Commission. At appellant’s request, the case was transferred to the district court for the taking of additional evidence on alleged procedural irregularities. See Minn.Stat. § 14.68 (1988). The ease is now before us following the district court’s decision against appellant. Pursuant to Minn.R. Civ.App.P. 103.03(g), appellant alleges that the Commission’s decision: (1) was made upon unlawful procedure, and (2) was not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree and affirm the Commission’s decision. .

FA…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Sierra Club v. John O. Marsh, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  5. Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Max Schwartzman & Sons v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Holecek v. RossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Matter of University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Dullard v. Minnesota Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Evenson v. City of Saint Paul Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API