Legal Opinion

In Re Enlargement of the Valley Branch Watershed District

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 4, 2010No. A09-1175PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final decision of respondent Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR). BWSR’s order enlarges two watershed districts to absorb an area covered by a dissolving watershed-management organization and increases the number of watershed-district managers in one of the enlarged watershed districts. Relator City of Woodbury (the city) challenges BWSR’s decision, arguing that it was made using unlawful procedure and constitutes an error of law because BWSR permitted its authority to be improperly limited and failed to adequately articulate its…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. BFI Waste Sys. of N. Am., LLC v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API