Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Askew v. Goldhart

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1996No. 96-6PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Per curiam

In order to obtain a writ of mandamus, Askew had to establish a clear legal right to have erroneous information expunged from his parole records, a clear legal duty on the part of the APA to delete such misinformation, and the lack of an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law to vindicate the claimed right. State ex rel. Howard v. Ferreri (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 587, 589, 639 N.E.2d 1189, 1192.

In his first proposition of law, Askew asserts that statutory, administrative, and constitutional provisions require the APA to maintain accurate information in prisoners’ files. The court of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Howard v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Patterson v. V & M Auto BodyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Hattie v. GoldhardtOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. State ex rel. V Companies v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. The V Cos. v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Bravard v. CurranOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Carrion v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. RobersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API