Legal Opinion
City of Durant v. Cicio
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 18, 2002No. 94,498PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSummers, J.
T1 A statute, 11 0.8.1991 § 50-128, provides that no member of the Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System may be discharged "except for cause", and establishes a municipal board of review to hear "appeals concerning the discharge of members." The question is whether that statute was properly applied to review the discharge of Chris Ci-cio, the defendant/appellee, from his employment as a policeman with the City of Durant. We hold that it was. We vacate the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals and affirm the judgment of the District Court.
12 We previously granted certiorari to Officer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oklahoma Ass'n for Equitable Taxation v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Duncan v. City of Nichols HillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Hall v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- City of Tulsa v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Trant v. Medicolegal InvestigationsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Humphries v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- HALL v. GALMORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Twin Hills Golf & Country Club, Inc. v. Town of Forest ParkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- CITY OF JENKS v. STONESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.