Legal Opinion
McVicker v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF COUNTY OF CADDO
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 18, 1968No. 42764PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
The present action, instituted by plaintiff as a taxpayer of Caddo County, is a sequel to a previous one, McVickers v. Zerger, Okl., 389 P.2d 977, brought by a similarly named individual, and other taxpayers of said County’s county seat city, Anadarko, after the people of Oklahoma, by their vote on State Question #404, Referendum Petition No. 133, at a special election in May, 1962, adopted an amendment to Art. X of our State Constitution, by adding to its pro-visions, among others, those now contained in Sec. 35 of said Article. As said Article X existed previous to said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Litchfield v. BallouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Doon Township v. CumminsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State Ex Rel. Ogden v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Eaton v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- City of Del City v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 114Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- City of Tulsa v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Copeland v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.