Legal Opinion

Mark v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1900No. S.F. No. 2281PublishedCited by 24 opinions

PETITION in the Supreme Court for writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. C. B. Flebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Franklin K. Lane, City and County Attorney, William I. Brobeck, Sheffield S. Sanborn, and William B. Bosley, for Petitioners. John H. Dickinson, and Henry E. Monroe, for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition to prevent the respondent court and the judge thereof from enforcing obedience to a decree and writ of injunction issued pursuant thereto.

From the petition and papers it appears that on July 18, 1899, one J. C. Green, as plaintiff, commenced an action in said superior court against the said board of education and the members thereof, to obtain an injunction.commanding and requiring said board of education and the members thereof to cause to be used in the public schools of the city and county of San Francisco the text-books of the "California…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schwarz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Foster v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Dewey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Stewart v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.California Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wolf v. GallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Clute v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Ohaver v. FenechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Feinberg v. One Doe Co.California Supreme Court · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API