Clute v. Superior Court of S.F.
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Review directed to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The petitioners, having been by the superior court adjudged guilty of contempt, and ordered committed to the county jail for a term of forty-eight hours, applied to this court for a writ of review. The alleged contempt consisted in the violation of a temporary injunction, the execution of which had, as was claimed by petitioners, been stayed by an appeal. This court, being of the opinion that supersedeas, rather than certiorari, was the writ applicable to the case, issued an order to show cause why such writ of supersedeas should not issue, in the mean time staying all proceedings on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schwarz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Merced Mining Co. v. FremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Foster v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Dewey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Jacobsen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Wolf v. GallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- United Railroads of San Francisco v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Ohaver v. FenechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.