City of Burlington v. Staley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in failing to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial because (1) the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict, (2) the verdict was an improper compromise verdict, and (3) the jury in reaching its verdict disregarded the instructions of the court and instead acted under the influence of passion and prejudice.
Each of these contentions will be addressed in turn, but first it should be noted that a trial judge’s ruling on a motion for new trial involves the discretion of the trial judge, and is not reviewable in the absence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Duke Power Co. v. WinebargerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. PrivettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Moore v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bickley v. FordinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority v. LambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- City of Charlotte v. Whippoorwill Lake, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002