Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1979No. 4PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Justice.

Defendant has brought forward a single assignment of error. By it he contends that the court erroneously allowed the district attorney to introduce evidence of codefendant Mincey’s guilty plea and sentence. We find no merit in this assignment.

Defendant testified that Mincey stabbed the prosecutrix after both men had intercourse with her. He also testified that Mincey had made a “deal” with the district attorney and obtained a lighter sentence in exchange for his testimony against defendant. On cross-examination of defendant the following exchange took place:

“I don’t know which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. KerleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. State v. OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. AugustineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. ValentineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API