Legal Opinion

Moore v. Reynolds

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1983No. 8221SC831PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRASWELL, Judge.

Plaintiff first argues that the trial court erred in admitting testimony of the medical expert witness on cross-examination in response to a question containing facts unsupported by the evidence. Dr. Robert Underdal, an orthopedic surgeon, treated plaintiff and performed surgery on him after his accident. Dr. Underdal testified by means of a video tape deposition. After Dr. Underdal had testified extensively on direct examination, he was asked this question by defense counsel on cross-examination:

“Q. All right. Dr. Underdal, based upon the deposition of Dr. Reynolds and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McGill v. FrenchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Venters v. AlbrittonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. City of Burlington v. StaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Gallimore v. Daniels Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API