Legal Opinion

Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority v. Lamb

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 2002No. COA01-970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Judge.

On 25 May 1999, plaintiff, a public authority with the power of eminent domain, served official notice on defendants that it intended to institute condemnation proceedings to acquire a tract of land owned by defendants to construct the Randleman Lake Project. On 20 July 1999, plaintiff filed its complaint and declaration of taking which alleged the following in part:

3. . . . [T]he Plaintiff, Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority, has determined that it is necessary and in the public interest to acquire by condemnation the real property interest described in Exhibit A for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seaman v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Lane v. R.N. Rouse & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Gram v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. City of Durham v. WooCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Vandiford v. . VandifordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reese v. Mecklenburg CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Hamlet H.M.A., LLC v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. Bickley v. FordinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Smith v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API