Legal Opinion

Jackman v. Hamersley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1952No. 7797PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

Respondent, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, instituted an action to recover damages for personal injuries against Robert L. Hamersley and his son, James Hamersley, a minor, by and through Robert L. Hamersley as guardian ad litem.

A motion for nonsuit was granted as against the father; from a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff against the minor by and through his father as guardian ad litem, the minor, through such guardian, appealed. There is no cross-appeal from the judgment of nonsuit.

While the plaintiff was walking on the sidewalk in front of the home of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kubby v. HammondArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Dean Milk Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In Re MakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Stowers v. Union Pac. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Sandona v. City of Cle ElumWashington Supreme Court · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Lewiston v. MathewsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  2. McKee v. ChaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. White v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Turner v. PurdumIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Winther v. Village of WeippeIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API