Legal Opinion

Sandona v. City of Cle Elum

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1951No. 31498PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

This is an action in equity, plaintiffs praying for a decree enjoining the defendant city of Cle Elum, a municipal corporation of the third class, and its officers from interfering with commercial loading and unloading of trucks in front of plaintiffs’ place of business.

From the complaint, it appears that the plaintiffs Tony Sandona, Sr., and Mary Sandona, his wife, are the owners of a building in Cle Elum in which are located “Tony’s Transfer,” the United States post office, and two stores. Plaintiffs Tony Sandona, Jr., and Lorritta Sandona are husband and wife, and plaintiffs David and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. HouckWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Blessing v. WeldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Kimmel v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Huntworth v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Hickey v. RileyOregon Supreme Court · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Jepson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. City of Seattle v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. City of Seattle v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Pacific Northwest Alloys, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API