People v. Simmons
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The defendant was convicted j>f child stealing as provided in section 278 of the Penal Code. He made a motion for a new trial but his motion was denied and he has appealed from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion. ¡
Por some time prior to September, 1934, the defendant had been living in Oakland. He was about thirty-three years of age, had been married, and was the father of two children. However, on June 4, 1934, his wife obtained an interlocutory decree of divorce. Por some time Mrs. Ruth E. Kair had been living in an apartment house at 1219 Brush Street in the city…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. EdenburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Wells v. ZenzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. AnnunzioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. GillispieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- People v. WisecarverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Wilborn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. HyattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.