Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Annunzio

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1932No. Docket No. 135PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendant was charged in an information filed by the district attorney of Tulare County, with the crime of child stealing, it being alleged that on or about October 15, 1931, he maliciously, forcibly and fraudulently took and enticed away one Opal Hunnicutt, a minor child, with intent to detain and conceal such child from her father, in whose lawful charge she was. The defendant was found guilty by a jury, and prosecutes this appeal from the judgment of conviction.

The first point raised is that the evidence does not support the verdict, in that it does not show a talcing and enticing away…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People v. EdenburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. People v. FerugiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. WisecarverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. People v. SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. People v. EmmettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API