Legal Opinion
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Smith
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 7, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-73354, 93-74041PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
These two consolidated cases involve various claims made by three disgruntled franchisees against Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. (“Little Caesar”) and various affiliate companies or subsidiaries. The first action, Little Caesar Enterprises v. Smith, No. 93-73354, is a declaratory judgment action by Little Caesar against one of its franchisees, Gary Smith and his company, for a determination of contract rights under their franchise agreement. The center of this dispute and the subject of the three motions being considered, however, is the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Z Technologies Corporation v. The Lubrizol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Collins v. International Dairy Queen, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1996
- Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
- Astoria Entertainment, Inc. v. EdwardsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.