Legal Opinion
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Smith
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 31, 1997No. Civil Action Nos. 93-40520, 93-40521PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEPE’S SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
GADOLA, District Judge.
This court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), and LR 72.1(d)(2) (ED. Mich. Jan. 1, 1992), has reviewed the September 30, 1996 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Seven D. Pepe. That report recommends that this court grant plaintiffs’ second motion for class certification and certify the proposed damages and declaratory and injunctive class pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) and allow the Smith plaintiffs to serve as class representatives.
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Wyeth, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Olden v. LaFarge Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.