Z Technologies Corporation v. The Lubrizol Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.
Z Technologies alleges that The Lubri-zol Corporation violated the Sherman, Clayton, and analogous state-law antitrust acts by raising prices and enforcing a non-compete clause following Lubrizol’s acquisition of the assets of another company, which established a monopoly in the market for petroleum wax-based oxidates. Lubrizol moved to dismiss the claim on the pleadings. The primary question presented on appeal is whether Z Technologies’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Z Technologies contends that the continuing violations and hold-and-use…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- JoAnn Snyder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Tywana Pittman v. Spectrum Health SystemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Kravitz v. Summersett (In re Great Lakes Comnet, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018
- Hartig Drug Co. v. Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Baltrusaitis v. International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.