Legal Opinion

Z Technologies Corporation v. The Lubrizol Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 23, 2014No. 13-1254PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

Z Technologies alleges that The Lubri-zol Corporation violated the Sherman, Clayton, and analogous state-law antitrust acts by raising prices and enforcing a non-compete clause following Lubrizol’s acquisition of the assets of another company, which established a monopoly in the market for petroleum wax-based oxidates. Lubrizol moved to dismiss the claim on the pleadings. The primary question presented on appeal is whether Z Technologies’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Z Technologies contends that the continuing violations and hold-and-use…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. JoAnn Snyder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Tywana Pittman v. Spectrum Health SystemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  3. Kravitz v. Summersett (In re Great Lakes Comnet, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018
  4. Hartig Drug Co. v. Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  5. Baltrusaitis v. International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API